1. Home
  2. >
  3. Coal Mine Wage Board Decision

Coal Mine Wage Board Decision

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges LOCAl UNION 781 DISTRICT 17 Complaint for Compensation UMWA APPLICANTS Docket No. WEVA 80-473 v. Wharton No. 4 Mine EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORPORATION RESPONDENT DECISION On September 23 1980 Respondent Eastern Associated Coal

Get Price
BOARD LESSENS COAL PAY SCALE MOVE FOR PEACE WEEKLY WAGE

BOARD LESSENS COAL PAY SCALE MOVE FOR PEACE WEEKLY WAGE

BOARD LESSENS COAL PAY SCALE MOVE FOR PEACE WEEKLY WAGE RISE 7-to-5 Decision Rejects Illinois Pact but It Backs Travel Time OVERTIME KEY TO RULING Striking Miners Are Told to Return by Tomorrow .

Yukon Liquor Board decision for Coal Mine Campground

Yukon Liquor Board decision for Coal Mine Campground

This document outlines the Yukon Liquor Boards decision on June 27 2018 for Coal Mine Campground and Canteens liquor licence application. Yukon Liquor Corporation YLC Liquor Board

Australian Pacific Coal granted appeal in Dartbrook decision

Australian Pacific Coal granted appeal in Dartbrook decision

Jun 29 2021 Australian Pacific Coal AQC has been granted leave to appeal the Land and Environment Courts decision to join the Hunter Thoroughbred Breeders Association HTBA in barring an extension to .

The Coal Strike of 1919 in Indiana County and its

The Coal Strike of 1919 in Indiana County and its

The car pushing issue involved the compensation to coal miners for pushing cars from side areas of the mine to the main track where mechanical power moved the coal cars. More impressive however were the resolutions presented by Local 831 in Ernest which

Carter v Carter Coal Company 1936 US Conlawpedia

Carter v Carter Coal Company 1936 US Conlawpedia

Summary. Decided on May 18 1936 Carter v. Carter Coal Company proved to be a significant case on the Supreme Courts docket. The issue at hand dealt with the enactment of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 under one of President Franklin D. Roosevelts many New Deal programs.

Carter v Carter Coal Company 1936 US Conlawpedia

Carter v Carter Coal Company 1936 US Conlawpedia

Summary. Decided on May 18 1936 Carter v. Carter Coal Company proved to be a significant case on the Supreme Courts docket. The issue at hand dealt with the enactment of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 under one of President Franklin D. Roosevelts many New Deal programs.

National Labor Relations Board v R amp H Coal Company

National Labor Relations Board v R amp H Coal Company

Apr 19 1993 R amp H Coal Company Inc. has operated a coal mine near Jewell Valley Virginia on an on-again off-again basis since 1979. In August 1987 R amp H decided to reopen the mine and a month later became a signatory to the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1984.

You Cant Dig Coal With Bayonets Pieces of History

You Cant Dig Coal With Bayonets Pieces of History

Jul 11 2018 As the NWLB considered the dispute full production of coal resumed on May 4 1943. The board rejected most of the union demands in its decision on May 25 1943. In turn the miners rejected the NWLB decision and operations at the mines continued to be interrupted.

Jewell Ridge Coal Corp v Mine Workers 325 US 161

Jewell Ridge Coal Corp v Mine Workers 325 US 161

Local No. 6167 United Mine Workers v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. 145 F.2d 10 11 13. The Court now says Tennessee Coal Co. v. Muscoda supra is a precedent which controls this case and that there is no substantial factual or legal difference between this and the Tennessee Coal case.

JAMES H HARMON V CONSOLIDATION COAL CO

JAMES H HARMON V CONSOLIDATION COAL CO

Virginia Coal Mine Safety Board of Appeals. Issues The principal issue in this case is whether or not the complainants removal from the mine safety committee by the respondent was discriminatory under section 105c of the Act. Additional issues raised by the parties are disposed of in the course of this decision.

LOCAL 781 UMWA V EASTERN ASS COAL 80113422

LOCAL 781 UMWA V EASTERN ASS COAL 80113422

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges LOCAl UNION 781 DISTRICT 17 Complaint for Compensation UMWA APPLICANTS Docket No. WEVA 80-473 v. Wharton No. 4 Mine EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORPORATION RESPONDENT DECISION On September 23 1980 Respondent Eastern Associated Coal

JAMES H HARMON V CONSOLIDATION COAL CO

JAMES H HARMON V CONSOLIDATION COAL CO

Virginia Coal Mine Safety Board of Appeals. Issues The principal issue in this case is whether or not the complainants removal from the mine safety committee by the respondent was discriminatory under section 105c of the Act. Additional issues raised by the parties are disposed of in the course of this decision.

LOCAL UNINON V WESTMORELAND COAL 84092192

LOCAL UNINON V WESTMORELAND COAL 84092192

summary decision is that the miners who were working on November 7 1980 when the explosion occurred be given up to a weeks compensation under the third sentence of section 111 of the Act which as shown in footnote 1 above provides in pertinent part as follows If a coal or other mine or area of such mine

Nationalisation Timeline National Coal Mining Museum

Nationalisation Timeline National Coal Mining Museum

On 12th July 1946 the Act to bring the coal mining industry under state control gained royal assent. The Nationalisation of the Coal Mines Act 1946 made it possible to nationalise the entire mining industry. It also set up the National Coal Board NCB as the managing body for the whole industry.

Dynamic coal mine model Generic feedbackloop model

Dynamic coal mine model Generic feedbackloop model

This study examines the determinants of the productive life cycle of a single hypothetical coal mine. The article addresses the questions of how long the mine will operate what its annual production will be and what percentage of the resource base will be recovered. As greatly expanded production .

Records of the National Bituminous Coal Commission 1935

Records of the National Bituminous Coal Commission 1935

Aug 15 2016 Abolished following the Supreme Court decision of May 18 1936. Textual Records Minutes of board meetings September 26 1935- May 28 1936. Correspondence 1935-36. Records relating to the Sahara-Wesson coal mine wage dispute 1934-35. 150.4 CARTOGRAPHIC RECORDS GENERAL 1919-35 68 items. Maps 63 items Coal districts 1922-24 3 items .

central wage board for coal mining industry

central wage board for coal mining industry

coal mine wage board decision sportplaza be. Ma black coal mining industry award pdf black coal mining industry award ma definition of transitional minimum wage instrument inserted by pr from jan transitional minimum wage instrument has the meaning in the fair work transitional provisions and consequential amendments act cth where this award .

BILLY WISE UMWA V CONSOLIDATION COAL

BILLY WISE UMWA V CONSOLIDATION COAL

of the Mine Act was misplaced because there was no evidence that the posting of the danger board resulted from a firebossing examination by a certified mine examiner conducted pursuant to that section. 4 FMSHRC at 1334. The UMWA took the position that under the 1981 Coal Wage Agreement Wise was qualified to make mine examinations

COAL MINES MINIMUM WAGE ACT 1912 AMENDMENT BILL

COAL MINES MINIMUM WAGE ACT 1912 AMENDMENT BILL

COAL MINES MINIMUM WAGE ACT 1912 AMENDMENT BILL. HC Deb 20 April 1934 vol 288 cc1311-58 1311. Order for Second Reading read. 1.10 p.m. Mr. CAPE. I beg to move That the Bill be now read a Second time. I have been very pleased at the harmonious proceedings this morning and at the congratulations that have been deservedly tendered .

central wage board for coal mining industry

central wage board for coal mining industry

coal mine wage board decision sportplaza be. Ma black coal mining industry award pdf black coal mining industry award ma definition of transitional minimum wage instrument inserted by pr from jan transitional minimum wage instrument has the meaning in the fair work transitional provisions and consequential amendments act cth where this award .

Pennsylvania anthracite coal workers strike for better

Pennsylvania anthracite coal workers strike for better

To improve working conditions and increase wages for mine workers. Specifically a 20 wage increase an 8-hour workday down from 10 for miners and 12 for maintenance workers the right to check the operators stated weight of coal the creation of a grievance policy fair to workers recognition of the union and the right to collectively bargain.

UNITED STATES v PEWEE COAL CO FindLaw

UNITED STATES v PEWEE COAL CO FindLaw

Respondent Pewee Coal Co. Inc. is a coal mine operator whose property was allegedly possessed and operated by the United States from May 1 to October 12 1943 to avert a nation-wide strike of miners. Pewee brought this action in the Court of Claims to recover under the Fifth Amendment 1 for the total operating losses sustained during that .

JOHN MATALA V CONSOLIDATION COAL 79040001

JOHN MATALA V CONSOLIDATION COAL 79040001

wage rate for a continuous mining machine operator. After his transfer the Company continued to pay Matala 55.00 per day. On December 6 1975 the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1974 increased the standard daily wage rate for continuous mining machine operators to 57.20. Matala continued to be paid 55.00 per day however.

Nova Scotias Coal Industry Is in Decline The Province

Nova Scotias Coal Industry Is in Decline The Province

Apr 04 2021 Coal mining is coming to an end in Nova Scotia. But the industrys long history of lethal accidents labor unrest and prolonged decline offers a lesson for the future. A green energy transition will need public investment and control not piecemeal subsidies for private capital. Our new issue The Ruling Class is out now.